Why might it be beneficial for governments to restrict the types of plants and animals that individuals can keep as pets in a particular environment?

Because it can prevent the emergence of pests.

Explanation:

There are exotic and wild species that, when grown or released in another region other than their natural habitat, can become devastating pests. To prevent this from happening, governments restrict the types of plants and animals that individuals can keep as pets in a specific environment.

We can use as an example of this, a situation that occurs in Brazil, when it was still a Portuguese colony. There were no snails in Brazil, but the Portuguese took a large amount of the African snail to Brazil so they could eat Escargot. However, Escargot is not made with the African snail, when the Portuguese realized this, released the snails in the Brazilian territory, which has become a pest that attacks agriculture and causes disease.

explanation: grsaa

you are certainly talking about this picture:

a: is the label of the white square, it is showing the  replication fork, formed by helicase (d) ==> so it is the site of dna separation and replication 

b: is a new dna brand that is following directly the replication fork, so it is continuous ==> built continuously from 5' to 3

c: dna polymerase cannot replicate dna on its own, it needs the of their proteins, and one of them plays the role of a clamp which fixes  the dna with the dna template and increases  the processivity of the enzyme. ==>   stops polymerase from falling off the  template.

d: is the enzyme responsible for forming the replication fork (helicase) ==> unwinds and separates dna into two strands

e: is the delayed strand, it is built  in the opposite sense of the helicase, so dna will be built in fragments ==> built  fragments from 5' to 3 joins

and finally f: is the enzyme that builds  the new dna strand (dna polymerase) ==>   adds nucleotides to make a new dna helix.

credit: gradman555p98x9p

read more on -