What is the difference between food chains and food webs? food webs show a single path of energy in an ecosystem, and food chains show all the overlapping food chains in that ecosystem. food chains show a single path of energy in an ecosystem, and food webs show all the overlapping food chains in that ecosystem. food webs show the path of energy in an ecosystem, and food chains show the path of nutrients in that ecosystem. food chains show the path of energy in an ecosystem, and food webs show the path of nutrients in that ecosystem.

The correct answer is food chains show a single path of energy in an ecosystem, and food webs show all the overlapping food chains in that ecosystem.

Explanation:

The food chain is a directional flow of energy which shows how energy moves from organism to organism.

Food chains start from the autotrophic organisms called "producers" at the basal trophic level and end with the heterotrophic organisms called "consumers" at the highest trophic level.

Food web is the feeding relationship of organisms in an ecosystem which is composed of interlinked food chains. Food webs help in investigating the energy flow due to ecological interactions and studying prey-predator relationship

from almost the creation of the first true maps of the earth, people started seeing how continents would be able to fit together.   in particular, people noticed that south america fits almost exactly into africa.

you should be aware that while world maps were around early in the 1600’s and better defined by the end of the 1700’s, those maps were not ‘public’ but were treated as state secrets.   and so it was not till much later that the broader ‘science’ community had access to good quality and accurate world maps.

get the whole story here…

it is now known that most of the major continental masses can be fit together in a jigsaw process.   in fact we now know that the continents were indeed once all joined together as one land mass – the supercontinent of pangaea.

if you look at most world maps you will ponder how this is evidence, as the continents really don’t appear to ‘fit’ together very well.   what you need to understand is that the vast majority of maps are drawn using a map projection that has the north and south poles (which are points) are a line the width of the map at the top and bottom.   this means that the map distorts the true shape of the earth’s land and oceans as you love closer to the poles.     some other map projections distort less, but have the map shape looking like segments of an orange.   see here for a range of map projections.   check out the way greenland changes size in each!

what is more remarkable, is the next piece of evidence when added to the shape of continents.

location of mountains and fossils

what is remarkable, when you reassemble all the continents together, the ancient mountain ranges (many now eroded to their cores) and the location of rock types and fossils all match up.

mendel's first law states that during the formation of reproductive cells , pairs of hereditary factors for a specific trait separate so that offspring receive one factor from each parent.

explanation: