Biology
Biology, 21.02.2022 05:10, Nadyah7269

Sample Response: No, the resulting wave in the diagram does not demonstrate destructive interference. The resulting wave in the diagram shows a bigger wave than Wave 1 or Wave 2. If it demonstrated destructive interference, it would be a smaller wave or a horizontal line. With destructive interference, waves break down to form a smaller wave, or cancel each other out, resulting in no wave formation. What did you include in your response? Check all that apply.

The diagram of the resulting wave does not demonstrate destructive interference.
With destructive interference, waves break each other down to form a smaller wave, or cancel each other out, resulting in no wave formation.
No wave formation is represented by a horizontal line.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 21.06.2019 23:30, tporter00
New york city has 2,181 inhabitants per square mile. the state of alaska has 1.03 inhabitants per square mile. ecologists would say alaska has a low exponential growth population density birth rate carrying capacity
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 05:00, SmartScholar4094
Idon’t know the answer and i’ve been stuck on it for a while now skskskskks
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 05:30, ddavid9361
Which of the following produces carbon dioxide? a. plants b. animals c. decomposers d. all of the above
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:30, hdhdhd49jdhd
Match the pollutants. 1. a chlorofluorocarbon smoke 2. a biodegradable organophosphate insecticide freon 3. particle pollution paint 4. hazardous waste monoxide 5. carbon is completely burned malathion 6. carbon is incompletely burned dioxide
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Sample Response: No, the resulting wave in the diagram does not demonstrate destructive interference...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 07.12.2021 09:30
Konu
English, 07.12.2021 09:30