Many environmental organizations are attempting to help countries reduce their carbon dioxide emissions. Often, these organizations have limited resources (money and people) and have to pick and choose where they target their efforts. If organizations are trying to pi the countries that are the biggest problems when it comes to carbon dioxide emissions, do you think it would be best to focus on the countries that have the highest per capita emissions or the highest total emissions? Explain your answer in detail.​

The return of the wolf to yellowstone national park will probably affect the bird population to some degree, not significantly. while wolves will hunt birds when necessary, they prefer to hunt larger prey. the bird population will most likely only be affected when hunting is scarce for the wolves. birds of prey will also probably not be affected as much as other birds who spend more time on the ground hunting for food as the tend to spend more time in the air or in trees since they do not need to stay on the ground for long due to the nature of the way they hunt.

It's either -limiting factors or -scarce resources but i'd go with my first answer since the food and water are abundant they really aren't scarce