PLEASE HURRY A dominant gene that codes for white hair is represented by the symbol W. If a parent with the genotype WW is crossed with a parent of genotype Ww, what percent of their offspring will have white hair?
A. 25%
B. 50%
C. 75%
D. 100%

D

Explanation:

Seeing as the gene is dominate, the hair would still be white evening it's Ww. For the hair to be a different color both parent would need a recessive gene (w), though neither does, meaning all the kids would have white hair.

D. 100%

Explanation:

Using Punnet Square you will find out that,

There are two WW and two Ww. As you might know, only one copy of a dominant gene is enough for the offspring to display dominant characteristics.

Hence,

As all children have at least one copy of the W allele, They all will display the dominant trait which in this case is white hair.

Therefore the answer is:  D. 100%

Hope I Helped,

Regards,

Astrix <3

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

which fault and or fold did you find most difficult to diagram