Identify several reasons why a magnitude 6 earthquake in New Orleans might be more damaging than a magnitude 7 earthquake in San Francisco.

San Francisco has a history of earthquakes, while New Orleans has never had one. Because of risk assessment, buildings would be built much more sturdy in San Francisco vs New Orleans. New Orleans is surrounded by water and marsh and the area covered with loose sediment, which would exaggerate the ground movement. Both are densely populated but getting out of New Orleans is difficult (ex-Hurricane Katrina)

Explanation:

69 is the correct math for the amino acids