Why accurate biological drawings are more valuable to a scientific investigation than an artistic approach?

Scientific drawing is made-up to be precise and founded on real living things or fossils. Artistic drawings do not have to have any origin in realism and it can be abstract and it does not have to tolerate any similarity to any real life object. Artistic drawings are not unavoidably meant to be a faithful reproduction of anything in nature even though that was once the aim in the distant past before the invention of photography. Constructing good biological drawings be situated significant in that they aid to develop more accustomed with the topic over vigilant consideration to the smallest feature. Drawings allow to progress observational skills which is the principle of good science. Good drawings are those that abridge, highlight, review, and explain all at once. For these explanations, consideration to the smallest feature is precise significant. Biological drawings are not destined to be artistic masterpieces but are more like graphic notes that help record a set of observations. As such, these observations must be accomplished in class with the specimen directly observable.

Ascientist will use that to figure out how or why things are the certain way they are i hope this

Answer:

the statements that apply here about binary star system are

"have stars that might appear to wobble"

"often have one star that is brighter than other"

a binary star is a star system consisting of two stars revolving around their common barycenter. systems of two or more stars are called multiple star systems.