Which reason is not a valid one for using collaboration in the scientific process?

Explanation:

Which reason is NOT a valid one for using collaboration in the scientific process?  

A)  

Collaboration allows for scientists to bounce ideas off other experts and receive feedback.  

B)  

Collaboration allows scientists to divide the work and obtain results in a much faster method.  

C)  

Collaboration allows for a greater pool of prior knowledge to pull from when developing hypotheses.  

D)  

Collaboration prevents scientists from wasting time repeating experiments that have already been performed.  

Eliminate  

QUESTION WITH ANSWER CHOICES

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

frogs. the lower the ph the higher the acid content. frogs have the highest tolerance in this scenario.