Biology, 27.09.2019 21:00, negativechill

Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. the scientist concludes that a diverse group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. why should are some scientists skeptical of the scientist’s results and conclusion?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Biology

Biology, 21.06.2019 22:50, teresaswinger

An organism has the following traits multicellular cant photosynthesize has a skull. wht kingdom does this organism most likely belong too?

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 02:30, taythestargazer71

Did you know that a blue wales tongue weighs more than an elephant?

Answers: 2

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 03:50, Citatstuo

What did not occur in the proterozoic eon a)the oxygen levels increase greatly in the atmosphere, b)the emergence of the eukarya , c)muti cella’s eukaryotic organisms began to diversify, d)anaerobic bacteria kept thriving with more oxygen

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 09:30, tbair5417

Drag each description to the correct location on the image. not all descriptions will be used. describe the parts of a comet. the frozen part of the comet the atmosphere of gases and dust formed when the nucleus vaporizes tail made of small, solid dust particles tail made of ions that appears to point away from the comet's orbit

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. then, a scientist disco...