Scientists disagree about whether paper bags or plastic bags are less harmful to the environment. which fact supports the use of plastic bags instead of paper bags? a. plastic trash causes the deaths of more than 100,000 birds and other animals each year. b. people recycle 20% of their paper bags but only 1% of their plastic bags. c. it takes thousands more years to break down plastic than it takes to break down paper. d. twenty times more water is used in making a paper bag than in making a plastic bag.

Option (D)

Explanation:

Plastic bags and paper bags are both commonly used in today's world. Plastic bags have many disadvantages over paper bags, because it is non biodegradable, it creates pollution, and causes a lot of environmental problems. A large number of species are harmed every year.

But there is one advantage of plastic bags over paper bags. It is that the plastic requires about 220 litres of water for the manufacturing process, whereas paper bags require about 3800 litres of water for manufacturing process. It is also advantageous because it emits less amount of energy and green house gases during the time of manufacturing process.

Thus, the correct answer is option (D).

answer; /// i believe the name is ( check first good luck.hope this

picture a world where computers are building made-to-order personalized robotic arms and synthetic organs, drones are circulating above mars! due to the rapid growth of technology, the future has never been more unpredictable, and it presents a huge challenge in education: we are teaching students how to work in a future that we have never been unsure of. it is widely predicted that in eight years’ time, there will be more jobs in the fields of science, mathematics, technology and engineering than in any other discipline. and, as the technology continues to develop, it will soon become clear that addressing social problems will involve more innovative thinking, and analytical and technical knowledge than ever before. undeniably, there are no subjects that encourage innovative and creative thinking, deep thought, problem solving and independence more than the stem subjects. while it is widely commented on that there is a need to reimagine the ways stem subjects are taught in schools by embracing a more interactive and innovative approach to appeal to more students, it should come as no surprise that some of the most reputable educational organizations in the world are already implementing changes to embrace stem. harvard, for example, announced in 2014 that they were increasing their computer science faculty by over 50% and has since introduced computer science as a core subject for all freshmen. the urgency of supporting stem subjects at a young age is becoming more relevant than ever, as adopting a keen interest in the curricula needs to happen early. however, beyond the age issue is one of gender.

let me know if you need more