Arecent rival of the antievolutionary "intelligent design" argument holds that biochemical pathways are too complex to have evolved, because all intermediate steps in a given pathway must be present to produce the final product. critique this argument. how could you use the diversity of metabolic pathways that produce the same or similar products to support your case?

ID isn't even genuine science, and it's an affront to religion too: their hypotheses make God look moronic and compel him to things that we don't yet get it. What ID advocates do is they discover something that isn't yet comprehended (at a certain point, it was a bacterial flagellum) and essentially wave their hands and say "God did it!", and afterward when that thing has been legitimately clarified by genuine researchers, they discover something else that hasn't been clarified yet and rehash the process.