Select all that apply. an ecosystem could probably survive without
-carnivores -producers -sun -water -herbivores -climate -soil -decomposers

carnivores and decomposers.

An ecosystem is a physical environment involving living (plant, animal and human) and non-living  components (sun, water and soil). Living components are dependent upon non-living components for their survival. But they can sustain their lives even in the absence of non-living components. The ecosystem probably survive without carnivores and climate. Carnivores are organisms which feed upon other organisms. Carnivores are grouped in highest trophic level in a food chain. If carnivores are removed from the ecosystem a ecosystem can sustain the life of lower trophic levels in a food chain. Therefore, ecosystem can survive without carnivores. A change in climate can affect life forms living in an ecosystem. But if life forms can undergo adaptations to tolerate the change in climate then an ecosystem would probably survive without appropriate climate.

i'm gonna put a couple so you can chose from

explanation:

if you know the fur color of the offspring mice, you can use the ratios to identify the genotypes of the parents.

if either parent mouse passes a dominant allele, the offspring will have black fur.

if the parental mice has two different fur color (i.e white and black) , the color of the offspring's fur would be either black, white, or the combination of both (grey)

hope this : )

answer: land bridge theory. land bridge theory held that shifting portions of dry land explained the finding of identical species on different continents. plate tectonic theory eventually eliminated the land bridge theory.