(GIVING BRAINLIEST) You have been given a piece of evidence indicating that plant and animal life is scarce in this environment. Identify this environment and the correct explanation.

A) This is a tundra because it is too hot for plant and animal life to live in.

B) This is a swamp because it is too cold for plant and animal life to live in.

C) This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.

D) This is a rainforest because there is too much precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.

The answer is C

Explanation:

There is both plant and animal life in all of these, but it tends to be most scarce in deserts

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

burning fossil fouls really decrease the carbon in the atmosphere so b