Biology, 16.01.2021 16:10, s103394

Suppose scientists determine that a set of genes is significantly more prevalent in murderers than in the population at large. Would that mean that murderers are not at fault for what they do? Why or why not?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Biology

Biology, 21.06.2019 15:30, oasmith2005

Based on the evidence in the excerpt above, describe in your own words what it would have been like for a person to enter a meat processing plant in the united states

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 00:20, ayoismeisjjjjuan

6. in domesticated cats, the following are independently assorting: normal ears (t) is dominant to tufted ears (t); curved whiskers (c) is dominant to straight whiskers (c); the presence of six toes (s) is dominant to five toes (s); gene for hair length is an x-linked codominant. the three phenotypes for hair length are long (xhxh), medium (xhxh), and short (xhxh); medium is the heterozygous condition. given two parents: ttccssxhxh x ttccssxhy how many different gametes could be formed in the female cat with respect to these four traits? how many phenotypes are possible in the offspring from this mating?

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 14:40, mathwhiz9125

Genes that come together with different alleles are heterozygous. homozygous. genotype. segregated.

Answers: 2

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 15:30, niti1409

Kate is studying the transformation from unicellular to multicellular organisms. which metaphor is the most appropriate to apply to the map of the timeline.

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Suppose scientists determine that a set of genes is significantly more prevalent in murderers than i...