Is biological control effective than chemical control of crop protection?

No

Explanation:

There are different ways or methods of protecting crops from pest and disease infestation. Two of those ways as mentioned in this question are the chemical control and biological control. Biological control of crop protection involves the use of natural enemies of crop pests, which happens to be living or biotic organisms while chemical control entails the use of pesticides and herbicides to control crop pests and diseases.

Among these two methods, the chemical control is more effective because it yields instantaneous results and gets rid of pests and diseases faster. However, in terms of sustainability, the biological control method is more eco-friendly. Hence, based on this question, biological is not more effective than chemical control of crop protection.

cells use diffusion to get substances in and out of themselves. that diffusion will occur across the cell membrane or the outer covering of the cell. because we are talking about the surface of the cell, surface area and volume are  important factors here. as a cell increases in size, its surface area and volume increase as well.  we call that the surface area to volume ratio (sa: vol).  but the catch is that  volume increases at a greater rate than surface  area. in other words, as a cell gets bigger, the sa: vol gets smaller. so a really small cell like bacteria is mostly cell membrane (surface) with very little contents (volume). a really big cell like an egg, is mostly insides with a super thin membrane. so what ends up happening is that the cell cannot efficiently diffuse all of the stuff it needs in/out to survive. therefore cell size is limited to about 100mm. so how do we make organisms bigger than 100mm? cells divide! by dividing and becoming multicellular, organisms are able to grow!   check out the diagrams i attached to see the effect of sa: vol. i hope this ! good luck!

true is the