Biology
Biology, 01.12.2020 16:40, christiancase06

If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance that takes a long time to break down (has a long half life), or a substance that breaks down quickly? is it A. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there won't be enough left to measure

B. A substance that breaks down slowly, because then there will be enough left to measure.

C. A substance that breaks down quickly, so it will be all gone and we'll know it's old

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 21.06.2019 18:00, bri9263
How did the research presented in the article affect scientists' understanding of the evolution of eukaryotes
Answers: 2
image
Biology, 21.06.2019 21:10, RonGeffrard9597
Complete the possible outcomes for each generation in the pedigree chartaa aa aa
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 21.06.2019 21:30, irishdreamer0689
List the advantages and disadavantages of the switch from persistent chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides (such as ddt) to nonpersistent organophosphate pesicides. have the benefits of the switch outweighed the disadvantages? explain.
Answers: 3
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 01:00, Ayyyyeeeeeeewuzgud
Why reason best illustrates why hershey and chase chose to use viruses in their experiment?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
If a scientist wants to figure out how old a rock layer is, would it be useful to use a substance th...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 23.06.2019 21:00