One argument in response to the "Commons" idea is that private land ownership will prevent a "tragedy" from happening. Based on the article, do you agree or disagree? Why?

agree

Explanation:

The common argument which is based on shared assets and the behavior of each individuals.

When the land ownership becomes private a tragedy is avoided as each individual treats the land with care and caution, unlike when it’s a common( shared) where they all don’t care what happens to the land or it’s aftermath so far they all gain personally. So yes when it’s a private land then and then do they truly prevent any tragedy associated with common to happen.

the answer is admiramos

the rule for verbs is whoever you are referring to (in this case 'nosotros'), you need to change the ending of the word.

nosotros - amos

yo - o

tu - as

el, ella, usted - a

ellos, ellas, ustedes - an

(examples: nosotros bailamos (instead of bailar) or yo hablo (instead of habla)