Biology
Biology, 23.10.2020 03:01, BradFarquharson472

Cells Test 2 2020 21 UPDATED / 2 of 25 Which of the following best explains what would happen to animal cells if plant cells did not
perform photosynthesis?
A Animal cells would not be able to process energy from sunlight
B. Animal cells would not have oxygen to produce glucose.
c. Animal cells would not have carbon dioxide to produce energy
D. Animal cells would not have glucose to produce energy

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 21.06.2019 14:30, Honeyswish7730
Which statements describe incomplete dominance? traits are usually dominant. traits are neither dominant nor recessive. offspring exhibit an intermediate form of alleles from the parents. both alleles, one from each parent, are expressed in offspring. incomplete dominance involves the interaction of two alleles.
Answers: 2
image
Biology, 21.06.2019 14:40, kahliey
Select all the correct answers. which statements fail to meet the requirements of a scientific claim? 1 even though evidence indicates that the solar system's planets follow elliptical paths, copernicus's model involving circular orbits is true. 2 the evidence supporting newton's laws of motion was accurate in newton's time, but the universe operates differently today. 3 flowers that reflect the most ultraviolet light are more likely to attract bees and other pollinators than flowers that reflect less ultraviolet light. 4 in the final 100 meters of a 10,000-meter race, an athlete's speed is more strongly related to anaerobic efficiency than to aerobic efficiency.
Answers: 2
image
Biology, 21.06.2019 17:30, person73
Explain the side effects of cancer treatments
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 00:30, loveagirl111puppy
On a recent expedition to a remote region of northern canada, scientists uncovered skeletal remains from about 100,000 years ago. surprisingly, all the skeletal remains, which included many species from differing biological families and spanned about two thousand years, showed evidence of experiencing temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees fahrenheit (or 538 degrees celsius). which of the following, if true, best explains the apparent paradox between the cold environment and the evidence of the bones experiencing hot temperatures? (a) chemical changes that naturally occur during the process of decay in only one north canadian species produce the same evidence of the species' skeletons being exposed to hot temperatures as the expedition scientists found. (b) a little over 103,000 years ago, a large fire is known to have occurred in northern canada. (c) strong evidence exists that as early as 70,000 years ago, homo sapiens around the world relied heavily on fire to cook animals. (d) in the same expedition and in roughly the same layer of excavation, scientists found rudimentary wood cutting and hunting tools used by early humans.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
Cells Test 2 2020 21 UPDATED / 2 of 25 Which of the following best explains what would happen to an...

Questions in other subjects: