What should the scientist do to best gain scientific understanding of this topic? Analyze the results, and change the experimental methods to retest the hypotheses in a different way.
Discard the faulty results that do not support the original hypothesis, and repeat the experiment using the same methods.
Analyze the procedural errors that took place in the experiment, and summarize these in a conclusion statement.
Repeat the experiment and adjust new data to support the original hypothesis.

The correct answer would be - Analyze the results and change the experimental methods to retest the hypotheses in a different way.

Explanation:

In a scientific investigation or experiment, if there is an unexpected result during testing a hypothesis. A Scientist must analyze the procedure and result to find the possible explanation or errors that led to a particular result.

After analyzing and finding what must have happened scientists need to do changes in the experiment setting or method and retest the hypothesis in a different way to a better understanding of the topic.

your the dumbest b**tch ive ever seen

primary succession begins with a bare rock and ends with a forest secondary succession begins after a natural disaster where there is a temporary setback after a forest fire or local destruction, but the surrounding area can fill in