What evidence does Dr. White use to describe the species Ardi as “neither a chimp, nor …human.”

It means that the anatomical characteristics found by Dr. White, are different enough for him to affirm that what he found does not belong to the species of the Chimp or to the human being.

Explanation:

This question refers to the 4.4 million-year-old partial skeleton of Ardipithecus ramidus, which Dr. Tim White and his colleagues discovered in 1994. Upon realizing that this skeleton, possibly belonged to a primate, everyone was caught up in the research, thinking that it could be an ancestor of human beings, however, the anatomical characteristics of this skeleton, diverged greatly from those found in Chipanzé skeletons and human skeletons, which made Dr. Tim conclude that the skeleton did not belong to any of these two species and indicated a different species.

i think the answer is

mass

there are so many examples for that in different areas, like biology experiment carried out in our lab recently.

here's one link: