Scientific consensus supports the idea that living organisms require oxygen. Then, a scientist discovers a type of bacteria that
metabolizes sulfur instead of oxygen, and thus survives in environments without oxygen. The scientist concludes that a diverse
group of many different organisms could live in an oxygen-free environment. Why are some scientists skeptical of the scientist's
results and conclusion?
The results are different from the scientific consensus.
The conclusion shows the scientist is not open-minded.
The results will be difficult for scientists to reproduce.
The conclusion needs to be supported by more evidence.

If you answer this i"ll give you brainiest and all these points me if you do i love you 7. a doctor is at work taking care of sick patients. she spends a few minutes trying to figure out why a particular patient is sick. she taps the patient's knee to test his reflexes. while she is examining him, the patient coughs on her. a) describe the function of the skeletomuscular system in this situation. (3 points) b) describe the function of the circulatory and respiratory systems in this situation. (3 points) c) describe the function of the immune system in this situation. (3 points) d) describe the function of the nervous system in this situation. (3 points) e) describe one way that any two of the doctor's body systems worked together in this situation. (3 points)

This is due ! matching pairs of chromosomes from parents are called a. homologous chromosomes b. heterozygous chromosomes c. herterogenes d. homologous bands

Which description provides the best objective summary of the article in the passage?