Overall, do you think the Chernobyl accident has actually been ecologically beneficial for the ecosystems within the exclusion zone? Which do you think is more damaging or dangerous to the biodiversity – the contamination from the radioactive fallout, or the presence of a large human population? Justify your answer.

After the accident, radioactive materials were deposited mostly on open surfaces such as lawns, parks, roads, and building roofs, for instance by contaminated rain. Since then, the surface contamination in urban areas has decreased because of the effects of wind, rain, traffic, street washing and cleanup.

Explanation:

the answer is true when observing or determining population size, a direct observation is use, in which each organism is counted in a population or in an area. one benefit of this measure is that you get the exact population count but it will take a long time to  determine  the  size  of a  population.