Take a look at the statement below:

fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers.

how could this statement be revised to make it a hypothesis?
a.) fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. b.) fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural.
c.) plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.
d.) plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.

The correct answer is option C, that is, plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.

Explanation:

The given hypothesis is that fish meal is better in comparison to artificial fertilizer. The revised statement to this hypothesis could illustrate the influence of fish meal that influences the plant in a better manner in comparison to the artificial fertilizers. Thus, the statement that is when the plants are fed with a fish meal they grow taller in comparison to the plants, which are fed with artificial fertilizer is the correct one.

i don’t no. suiopgohjk

this is true, assuming that the allele is completely recessive and incomplete dominance is not a factor.