Griffith and Avery's transformation experiments allowed us to identify that DNA is our genetic information. Which of the following scenarios would result in bacterial cells that are capable of killing mice upon injection?

A. Heat killed non-virulent bacteria is added to a live virulent bacteria strain.
B. Heat killed virulent bacteria is added to a heat killed non-virulent bacteria strain.
C. A heat killed virulent bacteria that is treated with a nuclease, is then added to a non-virulent bacteria strain.
D. Heat killed mouse cells are added to a non-virulent bacteria.

1. desertification

2. captive breeding

3. black rhinoceros

4. renewable resources

explanation:

mark brainliest!

bc blah

explanation:

bc blah

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

1. b.

2. d.

3. a.

5. d.

6. c.

these are the only ones that i know, i hope this , and good luck.