Which possible outcome below would not have supported the hypothesis?

if generation 3 had 33% of all three birds

if each bird ate only one type of food and not the other two

if generation 3 had flock distributions similar to those shown in the graph below

they each offer a fresh glut of resources to the organisms that can arrive and exploit them. as individuals and new species continue to appear, they actively and passively alter the environment. competition for shared resources increases, local abiotic and biotic conditions shift, and the relative abundances of species change accordingly. the process is called ecological succession, and it is one of the earliest and most well-known concepts in ecology.

the answer is c

explanation:

it's unlikely a majority of a large population would agree on issues

hope this : )