Your science class is observing the organisms found in local pond water. You have discovered this paramecium and are hoping to observe how the paramecium injects food. Your lab partner suggests using an electron microscope to see all the details in 3-D. You disagree: you believe a light microscope must be used. Using the table, support your decision to use a light microscope.
A) The paramecium is not very small It can easily be observed using the light
microscope
B) You want to observe life processes. You cannot use an electron microscope
to observe living specimens.
C) In order to see the paramecium, you must stain the slide. You cannot stain
a slide if using an electron microscope.
D) The beam of electrons used in the electron microscope is too dangerous to be used in a high school classroom environment.

Researchers determine that the biodiversity in a woodland region is declining. they identify two major threats to the region's biodiversity, a method to address each threat, and the expected outcome of each method. this information is shown in the table. threat method number of species that benefit number of years to see benefit habitat fragmentation reforestation 450 8 introduced prey species biological augmentation 150 2 which statement is an accurate explanation of the information in the table? a. biological augmentation would benefit only a few species because it is typically not very effective. b. biological augmentation would take less time to be effective because it targets the majority of prey species. c. reforestation would take the longest time to be effective because trees take several years to grow. d. reforestation would not benefit many species because most forest species live on the ground.

In the practice of science, this type of reasoning is used to develop explanations.

2polnis which of the following is an advantage of an in vitro experiment?me