Explain why scientists should welcome evidence and arguments that contradict accepted scientific theories.

Explain why scientists should welcome evidence and arguments that contradict accepted scientific theories?

Over time, science has never based there theories on assumptions. It must have been tested severally before the acceptance of such theories but every scientific submissions must be criticized which gives room for improvement in science.

Science is like an object in motion, there is always advancement day by day. So evidences with general perceptions would be greatly welcomed and tested virtually using every necessary tools in order to validate the authenticity.

Before anyone would criticize, such scientist must have tried the earlier theory severally and prove it to be wrong by providing answers that arises from such questioning, this birth another way forward that scientists in that field take as challenge to work on it and either oppose the earlier theory stated or validate the authenticity of the criticized theories

.Explanation:

answer; i believe the correct answer is (data); /// good luck

the function of the protein macromolecule is to move things in and out of the cell and transport other molecules in the body. there are many functions of proteins. they are the basic building blocks of living things and are responsible for the growth and repair of body cells and tissues.

explanation: