A research company uses a device to record the viewing habits of about 12 comma 50012,500 households, and the data collected over the next 2 yearsover the next 2 years will be used to determinenbsp whether nbsp whether the proportion of households tuned to a particular sportssports programnbsp decreases.

cross-sectional study

Explanation:

A cross-sectional study is an observational research that has to do with data analysis of variables or sane set of variable obtained at a particular point of time (a snap shot)across a sample population. It is also called cross-sectional analysis, transverse study or prevalence study.

In this study type, the variable is said to be constant. It can either be a descriptive (to show the frequency and distribution of the study topic in a particular area) cross-sectional study or an anakytical cross-sectional study (to show the relationship between two related or unrelated variables).

As in this case study, if a significant amount of the population view a particular sport program more than the others, the researcher can conduct further studies to understand the reason behind the variation in populations that viewed a particular sport program – like a longitudinal study.  

In a cross-sectional study, to determine the prevalence, multiple parameters are estimated simultaneously – questions, observations, and answers. Prevalence = amount of cases at a certain period in time / population of people at that certain period.

The cross-sectional studies is swift to perform, variblels are retrieve once, help determine different outcomes with the prevalence value too, can be used for descriptive analysis and to promote further research.

true is the final answer!

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."