Why did mr. and mrs. hadley call in a psychologist, even though they had the power to turn off the nursery themselves?

They wanted the psychologist to confirm their suspicions

Explanation:

The Veldt is is a science fiction short story written by Ray Bradbury in 1950.

Mr and Mrs. Hadley live in an automated house called the Happylife home.

Their children, Peter and Wendy are becoming fascinated with the virtual reality room ("nursery") which is able to reproduce any place they imagine.

They are very concerned about the landscape the children have created. It signified their state of mind hat it signifies about their state of mind and they are alarmed at how they have no control over their own kids. Hence they call in a psychologist to confirm their suspicions.

To confirm their suspicion and to make sure that their children are fine Psychologically.

Explanation:

In order to be able to answer this question effectively, one must have read the book by Ray Bradbury "The Veldt". The main characters are Lydia Hadley, George Hadley, Peter Hadley and Wendy Hadley.

Peter Hadley and Wendy Hadley are the children of Lydia Hadley and George Hadley. The couple and their children lived in a house that is equiped technologically.

The reason they called the psychologist was to make sure to confirm their suspicion and to make sure that their children are fine Psychologically. They suspected that maybe the children will be thinking about violence because of things that they are seeing around the "nursery''.

picture a world where computers are building made-to-order personalized robotic arms and synthetic organs, drones are circulating above mars! due to the rapid growth of technology, the future has never been more unpredictable, and it presents a huge challenge in education: we are teaching students how to work in a future that we have never been unsure of. it is widely predicted that in eight years’ time, there will be more jobs in the fields of science, mathematics, technology and engineering than in any other discipline. and, as the technology continues to develop, it will soon become clear that addressing social problems will involve more innovative thinking, and analytical and technical knowledge than ever before. undeniably, there are no subjects that encourage innovative and creative thinking, deep thought, problem solving and independence more than the stem subjects. while it is widely commented on that there is a need to reimagine the ways stem subjects are taught in schools by embracing a more interactive and innovative approach to appeal to more students, it should come as no surprise that some of the most reputable educational organizations in the world are already implementing changes to embrace stem. harvard, for example, announced in 2014 that they were increasing their computer science faculty by over 50% and has since introduced computer science as a core subject for all freshmen. the urgency of supporting stem subjects at a young age is becoming more relevant than ever, as adopting a keen interest in the curricula needs to happen early. however, beyond the age issue is one of gender.

let me know if you need more