Why would sirna be prefered over a chemical inhibitor that targets the same molecule? a) the sirna will bind to more than just one sequence and result in various inhibitions. b) the specificity of the chemical inhibitor is high and not a desirable trait c) sirna is stable and will stay around forever where a chemical inhibitor is short lived. d) off argets of chemical inhibition may occur where sirna is specific to a desired mrna. e) none of the above macbook air

D) Off argets of chemical inhibition may occur whereas siRNA is specific to a desired mRNA

Explanation:

For clean supression of a protein, it is advisable to use small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Although, chemical inhibition uses many chemical compounds which may directly bind with the protein and cause its inhibition; but they can also have many off-target effects. siRNA technique specifically degrades the target mRNA that specifies the protein.

there are mainly three domains in biological classification namely; archaea, bacteria, and eukarya.

archaea includes all the prokaryotic cells which are characterized by their lipid membranes. they have branched hydrocarbon which is attached to glycerol through an ether linkage.

bacteria includes all the prokaryotic cells, the cell membrane of which are made up of the unbranched fatty acid chain. in addition, they are attached to glycerol through an ester bond.

eukarya includes all the eukaryotic cells, that is, the cells contain a nucleus and other membrane-bound cell organelles.

they can be autotrophic as well as heterotrophic, unicellular as well as multicellular

they include kingdoms like protista, plantae, animalia, fungi et cetera.

read more on -

explanation:

for 8 am not sure maybe yes?

for 9 if it is asking if the male is more or less it would be less

hope i even just a little : )