Ageologist and a biologist performed an experiment together and examined the data. each scientist formed a different conclusion. both conclusions were supported by the evidence. how is this possible? both conclusions are the same but have different wording. if more than one conclusion is supported, the hypothesis is invalid. there can be alternate explanations for the same evidence. each conclusion is based on different data.

its a  

explanation:

segmented body, an exoskeleton made from chitin, and joint appendages.

it’s

explanation:

answer;

a. sheep consumption efficiency would be reduced.

explanation;

-trophic efficiency is a measure of how much energy occurs at one level divided by the energy at the level immediately below it . trophic efficiency incorporates three types of efficiency:

-the proportion of available energy that is consumed (consumption efficiency).   it is the proportion of the available biomass that is ingested by consumers.

-the proportion of ingested food that is assimilated (assimilation efficiency).

-the proportion of assimilated food that goes into new consumer biomass (production efficiency).

-in this case, the grasshoppers would affect sheep by reducing the proportion of the available biomass that is ingested by the sheep.