Biochemist p. a. levene analyzed the components of the dna molecule and concluded the nucleotide was not the fundamental unit of nucleic acid polymer?
true or false

Getting rid of my account might as well do it with some fun make sure to read all of this it is hilarious a plane was about to crash and there were 5 people on board and only 4 parachutes. the first person said: " i am roy keane, one of the best footballers in ireland. i am worth a lot of money and my fans need me so i think i should be saved." the others agreed and gave him one of the parachutes and off he went. the second person said: "i am gerry adams, a radical irish politician who can really my country and i think i should be saved." the others said: "o. k.", and gave him a parachute. the third person said: "i am george bush, president of the most powerful country in the world. everyone knows i am a really nice guy and everyone thinks i am stupid, but i'm not, so i am taking a parachute." and off he went. there were two people left, the pope and a 10 year old schoolgirl. the pope said: "child, i am old and frail and have lived my life while you are young, with everything before you. you take the parachute and i will stay with the aircraft and take my chance." "it's o. k." said the girl, "there are still two bush picked up my schoolbag."

Ausable water source is one that can be used by humans for drinking or agriculture. identify the water reservoirs as usable or unusable based on their current state. oceans rivers glaciers freshwater lakes groundwater

Tara sees a commercial for a brand of pills that promise to boost energy and people perform better in work and school. as people in the commercial talk about how much better they feel when taking the pill, tara notices a message on the bottom of the screen that reads, "this pill is not approved by doctors and has not been tested in controlled experiments." what is the best conclusion that tara should make about the commercial? it is making scientific claims based on subjective observations. it is making scientific claims based on opinions instead of pseudoscientific facts. it is making pseudoscientific claims based on objective observations. it is making pseudoscientific claims based on opinions instead of scientific facts.