You are a defense attorney representing the accused. your client has been shown to have the same blood type as that found at the scene of the crime. explain to the jury why this information alone is not enough to convict your client.

Explanation: Well firstly sometimes family members share the same blood type so it could have been a relative that was their at the time of the crime. this is not enough to convict him because we do not know for sure if the blood type has a match to another person and we would have to see if any other DNA factors such as finger prints were left behind. If their is a trace of his finger prints then he is a suspect in the crime if not he could be a suspect until we find the other suspects finger prints and get a sample of his blood to test and see if it is a match.

uh two lol