Biology, 12.01.2020 10:31, masonsee4ytube

what was the difference between darwin and lamarck?

darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something lamarck did not do.

the idea of mutations was understood by both, but lamarck was able to prove it.

the idea of mutations was understood by both, but darwin was able to prove it.

lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something darwin did not do.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Biology

Biology, 22.06.2019 10:20, maskythegamer

Casts and mold are a type of preservation where the original material decays, leaving a mold in surrounding rock that can be filled with another sediment a. true b. false

Answers: 2

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 10:30, pinklover2002

Which of the following statements is accurate about evolution? question 10 options: natural selection only eliminates odd individuals. evolution means that a population never has changes in its genetic frequencies. mutations are always harmful. evolution means that a population undergoes changes in its gene frequencies over time.

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00, deandrehudson18

What problem would a person most likely have if her kidney did not work correctly?

Answers: 2

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 17:00, abee122

Internal feedback works to maintain homeostasis when your a. heart rate decreases as your white blood cells increase b. breathing rate decreases as your red blood cells decrease c. heart rate increases as your liver is cleaning blood d. breathing rate increases as your heart rate increases

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

what was the difference between darwin and lamarck?

darwin was able to explain evolutio...