When dr. smith diagnoses a patient with schizophrenia and dr. jones diagnoses that same patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder, we would say that dr. smith and dr. jones do not

I found options for this question elsewhere however the question was slightly different as it asked what the doctors DO have. The options for that question were.

1) low diagnostic validity.

2) low diagnostic reliability.

3) low diagnostic accuracy.

4) low diagnostic criteria.

So in that case the correct answer was 2. Low diagnostic reliability. This means that both doctors ability to diagnose patients is mostly unreliable and cannot be trusted.

However if you are asking what the doctors DO NOT have then the answer would be HIGH diagnostic reliability and the explanation would be same.

the framers of the constitution insisted that federal judges be nominated instead of elected due to their desire to have judges above the shifting whims of the masses.

the hope, whether achieved or not, was that federal judges would only be beholden to the law and that by not having judges be elected, they would be protected if that law dictated an outcome that ran counter to popular opinion.

substitution is the answer in this case