Which of the following statements is not true of the ci (lambda repressor) protein in bacteriophage lambda? -can repress transcription if the ci gene -capable of both positive and negative auto regulation -can repress transcription of the cro gene -can activate transcription of the cro gene -can activate transcription of the ci gene

Among the following statement about the lambda bacteriophage the one that is not true is that capable of both positive and negative auto regulation

Option A

Explanation:

The lambda bacteriophage is a virus that affects the bacteria especially the Esrechia coli bacterium, the genetic material gets injected to the cytoplasm of the bacteria from its head leaving back the protein capsid of the cell, ones it gets into the host cell it either follows the lytic or the lysogenic cycle. In the lytic cycle it replicates inside and causes rupture of the host whereas in a lysogenic phase it coexists with the host.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

answer: c

explanation: