Brainliesttt compare and contrast the structure and function of a compound light microscope and a dissecting microscope. be sure to discuss when each would be more useful than the other.

Compund light microscopes have a more powerful magnification and a more complex structure and body. These are more useful when somebody desires o observe smaller things such as cells. These microscopes though, are not powefull to see organelles and things smaller than cells.

Dissecting microscopes don't have a powerful magnification and have a very simple structure and body, not even having built-in lights, since it uses the light in the exterior, that reflects on the object that is being seen. These are used mostly on entomology (study of insects, to not say much) where you only need to see the insects body parts in detail, not requiring a powerful magnification.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101

answer and explanation;

volcanic rocks are igneous rocks which form from lava, molten rock which has been thrust out of a volcano onto the surface of a rocky body such as an asteroid, planet, or dwarf planet.  

plutonic rocks are igneous rocks which form from subterranean chambers of molten rock or magma. plutonic rocks make up the base of continental crust as well as oceanic crust. their slow rate of formation causes them to be coarse grained since there is plenty of time for large crystals to form before the magma solidifies into rock.

the textural difference is that plutonic rocks are more coarse grained than volcanic rocks. plutonic rocks are coarse grained while volcanic are fine grained ; glassey or fragmental. since fine and coarse are adjectives the decision as to whether a rock is fine or coarse grained is generally made on the bases of whether or not the individual crystals can be seen in most if the rock.