Why are there more debates answers when discussing stem cell research

Hello, Lead082656. The debates of the embryonic stem cell research are pretty heavy to digest. There's always two sides to the debate: do not destroy a human life to research it and the other one would be to take the stem cells of the embryo and find a cure for other people's diseases and illnesses. More people want to argue the first one instead of the second one, which is why there is more debating going on instead of research. I hope I helped

(These are sample answers so I don't recommend copy and paste)

Scientists do not fully understand how stem cells proliferate and differentiate.

There are ethical concerns debated when using embryonic stem cells for research.

Scientists do not know the signals used by stem cells and if they are similar when forming specialized cells; they are unable to grow specialized and unspecialized cells in the lab.

It is a newer technology with many questions left to answer.

both anaerobic and aerobic respiration use glucose (or other carbohydrates), proteins and lipids to produce atp and nadh. cell uses those energy molecules, obtained from food and   breaks them down during the chemical reactions of respiration. in anaerobic respiration, nadh is regenerated to nad+ by enzymes lactate dehydrogenase (lactate is produced, e.g. in muscle cells) or by alcohol dehydrogenase where ethanol is produced (alcohol fermentation), while in aerobic respiration, electrons from nadh are deposited in the mitochondria to regenerate nad+ (electron transport chain. anaerobic respiration produces 2 atp per molecule of glucose compared to aerobic respiration where about 38 atp molecules are produced.

i'm guessing this is from edg enuity so the answers would be, from top to bottom,

theodor schwann

matthias schleiden

robert hooke

rudolph virchow

anton van leeuwenhoek