True or false the little river salt marsh restoration project centered around replanting marsh sedges and grasses.

The correct answer is - False.

The Little River Salt Marsh Restoration Project did not had its main focus on the replanting of marsh sedges and grasses, but instead the focus of the movement was to restore the tidal patterns that affected and supported the marsh.

The Little River Salt Marsh was once a relatively large marsh, but over time, the tidal influence has been reduced bit by bit, so the marsh lost its natural support, thus started to decline. Because of this, multiple measures were undertaken in order to restore the natural tidal movement towards the marsh, and little by little it has worked out nicely.

false all the way homies

Explanation:

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."