Does the essay accurately describe the artwork? Does it mention the important features that make the artwork distinctive? Explain. Do you think the writer’s arguments make sense based on the visual evidence? Do you find the arguments convincing? Why or why not?
How would you have analyzed this art? What different points would you have made, and why?

Give an example that you've seen in your life that is described in one of piaget or erikson's stages.

Why is it so important for art critics to get their reviews published by the media? a. unpublished critics can work only in art galleries, not museums, b. people must be published before they can be accepted into programs to study how to become art critics. o c. once critics' reviews have been published, critics no longer have to promote themselves to become known, o d. if no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.

What steps must perseus take to slay the gorgon?