1. Liberalist* and realist theoretical perspectives to international relations have different explanations for the causes of war and the conditions for peace and security. How does liberalism explain insecurity and conflict in international politics? What solutions does liberalism offer for achieving greater peace and security? How does realism explain insecurity and conflict in international politics? What solutions does realism offer for achieving greater stability and security? First, compare and contrast the theoretical perspectives of liberalism and realism on how they explain conflict in the world, and on the solutions they offer to move the world toward greater security. Second, imagine you are the Right Honourable Prime Minister of the Government of Canada or the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Which theoretical approach to international relations would you adopt to guide Canada’s current relations with states/non-state actors, and why? Provide specific empirical evidence and examples in the areas of security, peacekeeping and humanitarian intervention from the course materials to illustrate the differences and similarities between the theoretical perspectives. Also, reference the relevant Module(s), lesson and two course readings.

2.25 because you subtract the two

Is this a true-false question?   if so, it would seem best to mark it true.  or perhaps is this a prompt that's meant to get you started on an essay?   if so, start brainstorming thoughts about land ownership and feudalism and then start arranging an outline for your essay.the medieval economy ran on agriculture, so land ownership was the key to anyone's livelihood.  large landowners (nobility) controlled the land and the wealth that came from it.  common folk labored on the land as peasant farmers. they would owe a certain amount of their produce to the manor lord in exchange for the right to live and work on the land over which that lord claimed ownership.the feudal system has a role in all this too.  in feudalism, those at the top (lords or nobles, with the king at the top of the top) provided law and order and protection to those beneath them.  those at the bottom pledged their loyalty and service (taxes, duties, produce from working the land) to their lords and ultimately to the king for the ordered society protection they received from the higher members of society.all this presumes, of course, that people carry out their roles fairly.  too often in the feudal structure, those at the top demanded far too much from those at the bottom of the social order, and did not provide truly noble services or leadership to them.

African rituals have a lot of culture from the past and present from all around the world

The answer is letter d.