How does Roosevelt use appeals to convince the audience of her claim that the Declaration of Human Rights should not be amended by a totalitarian government? Select three options. Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by sharing data that prove that totalitarian governments do not allow their people freedom. Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by referring to Hitler’s rise to power and the tragic consequences of his government. Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by noting that the interests of the people are not considered in a one-party government. Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by explaining reasons why the amendment would allow the Soviets to ignore a human right. Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by proposing a compromise between the Soviets and other nations on human-rights issues.

Explanation:

Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by referring to Hitler’s rise to power and the tragic consequences of his government.

Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by noting that the interests of the people are not considered in a one-party government.

Roosevelt appeals to the logic of the audience by explaining reasons why the amendment would allow the Soviets to ignore a human right.

In this excerpt, Eleanor Roosevelt explains why a compromise on human rights issues is often equivalent to nullifying the protection. She does this by first describing an issue in which compromising (with the Soviets) would eliminate the protection of the right. She also appeals to the logic of the listeners when she explains that in one-party systems, the rights of citizens are often ignored. Finally, she emphasizes this fact by reminding the reader of Hitler's regime and its consequences.

the answer is false i think

no

explanation:

no