which genres do not cross over from theater into film or from film into theater. Explain why they do not cross over. Also, describe how you might make the genre cross from one to another.

Artists have always collaborated with colleagues in different genres: it's rewarding for them creatively and one of the ways that new audiences can be encouraged to sample the unfamiliar

Explanation:

This is the exact answer from edmentum so you might want to paraphrase it. But here you go I hope it helps someone.

The genre of mono acts cannot be adapted to screen because it involves a solo actor exhibiting the entire story using few props. Such a theater work cannot cross over into film because it will not keep the audience engaged. A film mono act will not be as effective as a theater mono act. To adapt a mono act effectively to the screen, I would add more physical locations in the story. I would add intimacy through camera angles and close-ups. This will help in keeping the audience hooked to the story.

A film genre that may prove difficult to cross over to theater is documentary. Documentary films are nonfictional. They do not have a well-defined plot or characters. With no story to tell, it is difficult for theaters to adapt a documentary for a live audience. But if a riveting plot is woven into the documentary, this film genre might attract theater audiences.

photography had emerged as an elite art pursued by a few creative individuals for a few wealthy patrons. but now, said bauldelaire, it was succumbing to "the great industrial madness of our times." it was becoming a mass production industry that catered to middle-class tastes, including a taste for gadgetry. the stereoscope, the first 3d imaging system, had turned looking at photographs into parlor entertainment. a "thousand hungry eyes were bending over the peepholes of the stereoscope as though they were the attic-windows of the infinite.