One criticism of restorative justice suggests that offenders may be good for the individual victim but may not be good for the “class of victims” who have yet to be victimized

One criticism of restorative justice suggests that forgiving offenders may be good for the individual victim but may not be good for the “class of victims” who have yet to be victimized

Explanation:

Restorative justice is the way justice is approached in crime in such a way that the offenders are held accountable for the harm they have inflicted upon the victim. Its main approach is to organize a meeting of the people involved- the victim, the offender, and the communities, to directly address the issue and try to repair the harm/ damage done.

While this process helps heal misunderstandings and even help people/ culprits get forgiven, there are numerous criticisms of such acts as it does not apply for the whole "class of victims" who are hurt and may also be permanently "damaged". One such criticism is the idea that forgiving offenders may do good for the one victim, but it cannot be the solution for a whole class of victims, who are not yet "accepted" or "deemed" to be victims.

i got this answer from a really friend, and it was right.

hope this you like it me and a special to that dude!

artists need to create a realistic interpretation so that people in general can relate to the artwork. for a common people, an artist's impression gets increased only if he can create something which would look realistic. an abstract is difficult for a common people to understand whereas if a person can draw a girl with simple pencil sketch and if that looks like a real figure then the latter will be praised more than the former.