You are an eyewitness to a crime. a newspaper article talked about the
criminal's flowing black hair. during the crime he had a hood on, so you didn't
see the hair but now you can "remember" it vividly. this is an example of

memory reconstruction

Explanation:

The theory of memory reconstruction says that sometimes we can "retrieve" memory that did not even happen simply because other cognitive evidence affected it.

Our brains are trying always to have a clear memory as possible, to sometimes it will recollect memory that is not as accurate as it was. When we recoil it, it will even feel little it was clear, like the video, even though it is full of errors.

As the brain tries to have as full memory as possible, many things will easily affect it, like perception, imagination, beliefs, and outer influences.

In this case, we witnessed something, but as we do not have full information - the hair color of the criminal - our memory is influenced by the outside source of the newspaper. It builds on the picture of what we have and that is how we, all of a sudden, have a vivid picture of flowing black hair that we did not eyewitness.

photography had emerged as an elite art pursued by a few creative individuals for a few wealthy patrons. but now, said bauldelaire, it was succumbing to "the great industrial madness of our times." it was becoming a mass production industry that catered to middle-class tastes, including a taste for gadgetry. the stereoscope, the first 3d imaging system, had turned looking at photographs into parlor entertainment. a "thousand hungry eyes were bending over the peepholes of the stereoscope as though they were the attic-windows of the infinite.