Which statement best describes a difference between leonardo da vinci's virgin of the rocks and sofonisba anguissola'a the chess game?

The style, the technique used, the portrayal proportions, and the use of perspective. All these aspects are different in each painting.

Explanation:

Now, let's see:

The style: Da Vinci's The Virgin of the Rocks is a fresco, so you can see the wall features on the painting. On the other hand, Anguissola's art was executed using oil painting, created with egg tempera.The technique used: both use sfumato, which reduces the outline. But Da Vinci's painting uses sfumato in a different approach. The characters portrayed are almost mixed with the shadows, when The Chess Game has a different style. The outline is sharp but soft.The portrayal proportions - Da Vinci uses the symbolic proportion, which means that the characters are not in proportional size. He intends to show their importance, so the size is manipulated. This not happens in The Chess Game, where the portraits have a normal size.The use of perspective - Da Vinci uses a three point perspective, when Anguissola uses just one.

It would. a painted portrait would be an important thing because they are official and take real artists to paint and if it was a painted portrait it would mean that there's seriousness and a desire to work together. portraits are maybe even more so important today because they are not a mainstream thing and are made only when we want to impress someone since they take time and will.sending a picture would not be the same as sending a portrait because a picture is just taken with a camera and there's no soul to it. if a picture is a painted one then it can reaffirm, especially if both states people are in it. if it's just a photograph then there wouldn't be much to it.things today are different because there's photographs everywhere and seeing pictures has lost its meaning since they are so abundant and found everywhere. all newspapers have pictures and just sending the same picture as everyone has would not mean much since it's easily obtainable.  perception of authority has changed over the years because the people trust their governments less and less as years go by. before world war two, governments were trusted and presidents were believed to work for the good of the country. nowadays, everyone is looking out for things that might bring the downfall of governments since it has been shown that governments often do bad things to say in power.