Explain how political change makes political scientists cautious in stating how politics works or what values dominate it.

Someone's preference in politics usually based on the value and principle that we have. If, a scientist somehow negatively displayed a certain aspect/behavior of politics, a lot of people will see that as an attack to their value/principle, which will lead to public attacks toward that scientist. Because of this, many scientists are cautious about this topic

Idon’t see any choices but i think it’s because it’s the work for that class and so the teacher doesn’t get confused