Heres another if u think I was playing,

Do you think defendants should have be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

The law of inertia states objects that are moving continue to move, and alternatively objects that are static remain static, unless in both instances the objects are acted upon by another force

Many schools have a dietician on staff.