Law
Law, 22.07.2021 19:30, villarrealc1987

A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives. While still in State A, the plaintiff's auto was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, a citizen of State B. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries and damage to his vehicle amounting to approximately $90,000. The plaintiff filed suit in the federal district court for State A and obtained proper service of process on the defendant. Under the laws of State A, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another vehicle in the rear is presumed to have acted negligently, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Neither the law of State B nor the federal statutes or case law has adopted such a rule. Should the court apply the presumption in question

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Law

image
Law, 03.07.2019 20:30, Reese7977
What does the first amendment’s right to assemble refer to? the right of a group to express unpopular opinions the right of a group to make false claims the right of a group to meet in groups the right of a group to speak in protest
Answers: 1
image
Law, 16.07.2019 01:40, lalllda
During bad weather, you should travel_the posted speed limit.
Answers: 1
image
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10, makaylajones74pdxtrk
Justices practice judicial restraint when they
Answers: 3
image
Law, 16.07.2019 23:30, nemorinavory3832
Difference between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives....

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 25.08.2020 16:01
Konu
History, 25.08.2020 16:01