In which of the following can absolute privilege protect the defendant regardless of his intent?
a. statements regarding a third party made between spouses when they are alone.
b. statements made by members of congress on the floor of congress and by members of state and local bodies.
c. statements made by participants in a judicial proceeding regarding that proceeding.
d. all of these are correct.

D. All of these are correct.

Explanation:

Absolute privilege is a term used in US courts to refer to the situation in which a full defense is required in a defamation case. That is, when the defense (in court) has absolute privilege, any defamation made by the accuser in order to damage one's reputation is irrelevant. Absolute privilege can protect the defendant in any situation involving third party statements made between spouses when alone, statements made by members of Congress in the plenary of Congress and by members of state and local bodies, and statements made by participants in a lawsuit. in relation to this process.

anticipatory breach of contract

as the name suggests, an anticipatory breach is a breach of contract before the time of performance. so, if a promisor denies to perform his promise and signifies his unwillingness before the time for performance, then it is an anticipatory breach of contract.

and

actual breach of contract

while an anticipatory breach is before the time of performance, an actual breach of contract is on the scheduled time of performance of the contract. an actual breach of contract can be committed either.

hope this . : )

answer: it could be in all the same frase but if i want to be anyone here in the

same room the sumbiyt

explanation:

i find it more easry on the last too groups of peole and the legem imfortmation that i plot to do so